Women Warriors Need Their Own Combat Units
Ben Luxenberg 09/05/2013.
Writing about the Amazons in "The Iliad," Homer refers to them as antianeirai or "those who fight like men." Legend says they were a tribe of fierce warrior-women who struck fear into the hearts of their enemies and who would not suffer men in their company, let alone trust men to fight alongside them. Is it time for the U.S. military to test that strategy? As American forces were opened to women in recent decades, a line was drawn in 1994 with a rule barring them from infantry and other combat units. In January, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta formally lifted the rule. He gave the military services three years to seek exemptions if they wanted to keep some positions off-limits to women.
Others
believe that the presence of women will cause a rift in the traditional male
bonding of combat-arms units and damage the cohesion that is a key element in
the success of any battlefield unit. Many worry that men will have to pick up
the slack if women cannot perform at the same level -- or that floundering
women will endanger themselves and their comrades. Yet the tides of history
seem to be turning against these sentiments and the questions of whether women
can handle sustained combat operations. The issue is often framed now in terms
of patriotism and human rights.
The
service branches say that endurance and other standards won't be lowered, and
perhaps there will be special training programs to prepare women who wish to
become infantry. Yet there may be a better way to bring them into combat units
-- one that could serve as a test and steppingstone toward tighter integration.
In
professional sports and in the Olympics, men and women perform separately. In
boot camp and officer-candidate schools -- the entry points for all service
members -- men and women also are separated, with placement into different
platoons within the same company. So why not mirror what society at large and
the military already do: put men and women into their own teams, with female
infantry platoons on one side and male platoons on the other? An all-female
infantry platoon would not suffer from many of the problems that detractors
cite, such as a lack of unit cohesion caused by mixing the sexes. Like the
Amazons, female-only platoons could build their own brand of cohesion, which
may prove superior to the men's. The arrangement would also avoid putting male
soldiers in the position of feeling obliged to compensate for an
underperforming female.
While
the all-female platoon solution would not compensate for physical and physiological
differences and how they affect performance on the battlefield, it would be a
good way to test that line of argument. If the female platoons showed that
their combat performance equaled that of men, then the separated-platoon
arrangement would merely be a step on the road to full integration. If the
female platoons underperformed, then the idea of women in the infantry might need
to be scrapped or the women-only platoons would be the final compromise, with
their deployment based on battlefield needs. A staged approach rather than
rushing headlong into full integration in combat units may be the best
approach. Once the right (or privilege) to serve in any military specialty is
passed to women, it would be virtually impossible to change course, no matter
the consequence or effect on combat effectiveness.
But
who knows? Women running toward the sound of the guns may very well prefer
fighting alongside other women -- and their effectiveness may surprise even the
most pessimistic. The Amazons certainly made an impression on the Greeks.
Mr.
Luxenberg is a first lieutenant in the U.S. Marine Corps. His views do not
represent those of the Defense Department or the Corps.


No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario